when your favourite youtuber posts 😮🔫

Do take a look at MacKinnon's contract on Cap Friendly. He definitely set the benchmark for players. Unfortunately some teams will be in Cap Hell because there won't be a significant increase till 2025. As of right now the Leafs are over the Cap, in which they have 5 days to get into Cap Compliance. Matthews probably will stay in Toronto, but if they fail this year to get past round 1 in the playoffs how long will he stay. I had the same feelings about MacKinnon. I actually could see Coyotes making a play for him.

15x5.

how think do matthews deal cap space

My guess is one of these two contracts Signs with Leafs 14.5 mil x 2 years. Or 14 mil x 7 years for LA

Can’t wait to see what will happen

Lol that's not a thing.

Did this shit in junior too

So first, thanks for the vid. And second, I hope that you grow your channel. I've subscribed. Good luck,

Great video thx alot 🔥

WHATS NEXT?? FIRE BOOMERBRAD

Tkachuk is a future Flame forever. Speculating whether he stays or goes is just pure nonsense. The organization has some prospects yet and tanking this coming season is some kind of unbelievable thinking. Depth is what wins not having a Star or two. The Oilers like to build around a Star. The Flames win with 4 lines and 6 defenceman and having a decent goalie doesn’t hurt.

I don't know about Tkachuk, but I think Johnny probably made up his mind once they lost the battle of Alberta

stumbled accross this channel and i love the content so far!

Legend.

great video 👍

Relocate Calgary lol give Saskatchewan a team

john gaudreau is a real jerk

They need to sign Kadri. Orrrr they could just ship the whole team and tank for Conner Bedard lol

Debrincat is not worth 9 million on a rebuild. Plus Hawks want to tank and end up in the top 3 not a 6 or 7 pick.

Ottawa Senators won big time, Chicago could've ask for some players like...... Tierney, Brannstrom, Conor Brown,then add 1st round pick 2022 but no Chicago got only picks

Stoked to have the cat.. weird they didn’t trade back for korchinski, however the kid is really good and people are simply overhating because he’s the main piece back

If I were the Habs, I would wait 2 years when he becomes a free agent. The Habs are not going to give up assets for him if they can get him as a free agent.

Good analysis Mr Bllainer :) keep up thr great videos !

What kinda stupid question is this? 😤

TRADE THE CRY BABY DUBOIS TO MONTREAL

No, that shouldn’t have counted. After the NHL made this call analysts, video coaches and refs were all lining up to get on Bettmans jock. Faking all over themselves with the most bizarre convoluted bullshit reasoning. Shout out to Jenn Botterill for possibly the stupidest take when she suggested we ‘give credit to Makar to have the hockey IQ to bring the puck over the line and then not touch it until Nikushkin tagged up’ as though any of this was planned. Oilers fault for losing the draw and letting him walk in, but the league failed to protect the integrity of the game.

Trade him to the Habs for Shane Wright.

Had Toronto ruled this offside - there would have been no controversy. Maker, my favourite player, was in full control. Of course he is - he’s Cale Makar. To say he wasn’t, is to argue that any player stick handling isn’t in control of the puck. Nonsense. This is offside in every hockey rink & league in North America - except the NHL.

Have I got a bridge to sell you!

6:06 Once the puck crossed the blue line with the Av's other player still inside the blue line it became a delayed offside. The linesman is on the other side of the rink and the linesman never put his arm up and signaled a delayed offside. Once the other player clears the zone it is no longer a delayed offside. However, it was a delayed offside at 6:06 and there is no way the linesman could see from the other side of the rink that the puck was not on Makers stick.

In any game other than NHL or AHL. Possibly a few others like the CHL. That's no goal. Any minor hockey, any pickup game, any other hockey you would ever play. Even in a video game that would have been offside. That's all I'm saying. I don't care either way, neither team is my team. I understand the way the rules are stated, I get why it's considered a good goal. But imo, it shouldn't be, rule should be changed/better clarified. That being said, I obviously never got to the point of being a pro, so what do I know? :p

not good, if it was in Montreal and it was the Canadiens the goal would be disallowed... so fairness, disallowed

Good video. Excellent prep, well thought out. 👍

If this is not offside then all amature leagues need video replay eh. This need to be offside orherwise it's bad for the game

Your overthinking it kid.

If you need a detailed explanation to convince yourself that your eyes were lying to you, it ain't gonna work. It was a horrible call, and the idiots in Toronto are a joke.

Can't imagine any of those guys in different uniforms.

So if Makar is not touching the puck the refs considered he does not have possession. What if an Oiler defensemen were to hit him as he crossed the blue line, then it would be an Interference penalty?

What a crock. Enjoy your Mickey mouse league. Wrestling is a more legit sport.

It's actually easy to understand when you read Rule 83.3, which is the Delayed Off-side rule. People are only quoting one sentence out of it, ignoring the rest. Read the whole thing, but for this comment I will focus only on the relevant portion. First, was this delayed offsides? "Delayed Off-side -- A situation where an attacking player (or players) has preceded the puck across the attacking blue line, but...the attacking players are in the process of clearing the attacking zone." When the puck got to center ice and Makar stole it, Landeskog and Nichushkin were both in the offensive zone. At this point, the puck is in the neutral zone and NO ONE is offside. Makar advances the puck toward the blue line. As he does so, both Landeskog and Nichushkin are racing to exit the offensive zone. Landeskog exits before the puck crosses the blue line, meaning he's never offside. Nichushkin is still in the offensive zone when the puck enters. Makar is still in the neutral zone, so HE is still onside too. Only Nichushkin is offside, and he is attempting to get to the neutral zone, thus the offside attacking players "are in the process of clearing the attacking zone" when the offsides occurs. So, delayed offsides is the right call. The very next paragraph states, "If an off-side call is delayed, the Linesman shall drop his arm to nullify the off-side violation and allow play to continue if: (i) All players of the offending team clear the zone at the same instant (skate contact with the blue line) permitting the attacking players to re-enter the attacking zone." This happened as soon as Nichushkin hit the blue line. At that point, Makar was still in center ice, Landeskog was straddling the blue line, and Nichushkin was now on the blue line. All the Avs players were on-side. The delayed offsides is therefore nullified and nothing else that happens after this is off-side. This means that the length of time for the offside was about 1/10th of a second between the puck crossing into the offensive zone and Nichushkin leaving the offensive zone. That is relevant because the paragraph being quoted is, "If, DURING THE COURSE OF THE DELAYED OFF-SIDE, any member of the attacking team touches the puck, attempts to gain possession of a loose puck ... the Linesman shall stop play for the off-side violation" (emphasis added). The "course of the delayed off-side" was 1/10 of a second (I checked and it was literally 3 frames of a TV feed at normal speed, which is televised at 30 frames per second), and during that time no member of the attacking team touches the puck. Importantly, for that 1/10 of a second, you can't say that Makar is attempting to gain possession either. First, because he already has possession of the puck; secondly, because he makes no move in that 1/10 of a second that could be called "attempting to gain possession" -- he doesn't change his angle of attack, he doesn't change how his stick is positioned, literally nothing. Any attempt for possession happened while the puck was in the neutral zone and before the delayed off-side even happened. In other words, for the purposes of this rule, the ONLY thing that matters here is whether there was a touch or an attempt to gain possession during the course of the 0.1 second when the penalty could have been called.

From the NHL website - "Control of the puck" means the act of propelling the puck with the stick, hand or feet. If while it is being propelled, the puck is touched by another player or his equipment, or hits the goal or goes free, the player shall no longer be considered to be "in control of the puck. He was in control of the puck as soon as he took it from Kane and never lost control.

He definitely had possession

WRONG! NHL Rulebook, Page 213. "Possession of the Puck. The last player to physically touch the puck with his stick or body shall be considered in possession of the puck. (NOTE 1) A player can have possession of the puck without control, but he cannot have control of the puck without possession."

Yes, it was "technically" a good goal in the rule book. But.. Anyone who has ever played hockey knows that's offside. Give Makar the goal now but the rules need to change next season

What If you shoot the puck to the goal before blue line like this? Is it a good goal?

Rule 83.1 does not mention the word touch , it uses the words possess and control , change the wording and there is no debating , people interpret control and possession differently , for example , I possess a car , doesn't mean I'm touching it , I hired an accountant to control my money , doesn't mean their touching it , if it's a puck on the stick that is the determining factor then put it in the rules otherwise this will always be a subjective discussion , good job on the video though

Great take. It can only be offside when an attacking player ‘touches’ the puck which makar does not. It is very common to see players push the puck over the blue line but not actually touch the puck because they see a teammate in the zone which would trigger a delayed offside. People that say this is an offside play just don’t know the rules.

Willie nylander for 14th overall pick prob need to throw in another piece but that would help Toronto with their cap troubles

Even if somehow the cap could be manipulated is some alternate reality allowing Pittsburgh to keep both Malkin and Letang...if that scenario entailed the Penguins to be near cap-maxed, no realistic financial flexibility left...in my opinion it would be still be advisable to still let Malkin walk and get Letang under contract. Yes, Malkin is an All-Time Penguin, Hall of Famer. But he is 35 years old now and over the last couple seasons it has been shown that his proneness to extended injuries is getting worse. Aging will probably not reverse that trend. It's probably better long term for the franchise to part ways with Malkin and start planning the beginning of a new era with the cap space. Its cutthroat & its cold. But the NHL is a business.